vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY) and Crane NXT, Co. (CXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Crane NXT, Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($476.9M vs $247.8M, roughly 1.9× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). Crane NXT, Co. runs the higher net margin — 10.1% vs -6.6%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Crane NXT, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 6.9%). Crane NXT, Co. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.0M vs $-12.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Crane NXT, Co.'s revenue compounded faster (13.4% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
Crane Co. is an American industrial products company based in Stamford, Connecticut. Founded by Richard Teller Crane in 1855, it became one of the leading manufacturers of bathroom fixtures in the United States, until 1990, when that division was sold off. In 1960 it began the process of becoming a holding company with a diverse portfolio. Its business segments are Aerospace & Electronics, Engineered Materials, Fluid Handling, and Controls. Industries served by these segments include chemical...
BBBY vs CXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $247.8M | $476.9M |
| Net Profit | $-16.4M | $48.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 42.4% |
| Operating Margin | 68.8% | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | -6.6% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.9% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 58.9% | -16.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $247.8M | $476.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.4M | $476.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.2M | $445.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $404.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.7M | $330.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $399.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $311.4M | $403.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.1M | $370.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-16.4M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-20.9M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.5M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.9M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-81.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-61.0M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.6M | $41.6M |
| Q1 26 | 23.9% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.6% | 42.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.1% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 43.4% |
| Q1 26 | 68.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.8% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | -6.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.7% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.68 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.33 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $135.8M | $233.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $202.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $404.5M | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $135.8M | $233.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $233.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.4M | $182.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $152.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | $173.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $165.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.4M | $165.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $175.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $834.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $861.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $541.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $540.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $638.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $638.9M |
| Q1 26 | $202.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.4M | $989.8M |
| Q1 26 | $404.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.4M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $363.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $428.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $496.8M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.8M | $96.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.2% | 20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.5M | $105.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $62.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.9M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.7M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.1M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-75.9M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-12.8M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.4M | $78.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.1M | $-32.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-45.5M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-80.4M | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | -5.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.5% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.2% | 12.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBBY
Segment breakdown not available.
CXT
| Security and Authentication Technologies | $260.9M | 55% |
| Crane Payment Innovations | $216.0M | 45% |
