vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATRIX SERVICE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $98.9M, roughly 2.1× Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.). Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs -0.4%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MATRIX SERVICE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs -3.2%). MATRIX SERVICE CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.3M vs $1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, MATRIX SERVICE CO's revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 4.8%).
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of concrete pumping services and equipment rental solutions across the U.S. and U.K. It serves core construction segments including infrastructure, commercial real estate development, and residential building, supporting efficient, safe concrete placement for projects of all sizes.
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
BBCP vs MTRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.9M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-894.0K |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 6.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | 83.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $98.9M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $211.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.2M | $216.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0M | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.1M | $187.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.6M | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.0M | $166.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $-894.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0K | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.0% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | -8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.4M | $199.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $417.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $264.8M | $137.6M |
| Total Assets | $879.5M | $650.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.4M | $199.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $224.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $156.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | $124.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7M | $69.7M |
| Q4 25 | $417.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $417.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $373.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $372.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $264.8M | $137.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.3M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.7M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.7M | $156.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.3M | $164.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.9M | $165.8M |
| Q4 25 | $879.5M | $650.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $886.0M | $598.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $878.8M | $600.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $912.9M | $613.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.0M | $513.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.8M | $470.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $894.7M | $451.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.8M | $440.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.5M | $7.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.9M | $6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.9% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.7% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.5M | $45.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.3M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $191.0K | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.7% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBCP
| US Concrete Pumping | $72.2M | 73% |
| US Concrete Waste Management Services | $21.3M | 22% |
| Other | $5.4M | 5% |
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |
