vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOISE CASCADE Co (BCC) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.2× BOISE CASCADE Co). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 0.6%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -6.8%).
Boise Cascade Company is an American manufacturer of wood products and wholesale distributor of building materials, headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
BCC vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $8.7M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.8% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -87.3% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.3M | $-88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.64 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.79 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.84 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.61 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $477.2M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $477.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $761.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $922.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $890.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $28.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $73.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $131.0M | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $77.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.00× | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $131.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.7M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $77.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-81.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCC
| General Line | $626.6M | 43% |
| Commodity Product Line | $479.9M | 33% |
| Engineered Wood Products | $256.6M | 18% |
| Plywood And Veneer | $53.3M | 4% |
| Lumber | $10.1M | 1% |
| Laminated Veneer Lumber | $8.9M | 1% |
| Other Wood Products | $4.7M | 0% |
| Other Engineered Wood Products | $3.5M | 0% |
| Ijoists | $3.3M | 0% |
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
