vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.7M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.9× BayCom Corp). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs -3.8%, a 30.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BayCom Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -9.0%). BayCom Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $-5.6M). Over the past eight quarters, BayCom Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -1.0%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
BCML vs GENK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $49.7M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | -3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | -821.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $57.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $54.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $53.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $50.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $-566.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-261.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-301.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $-206.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $25.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $496.0K |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | -24.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $26.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $259.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $26.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $42.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $40.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $259.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $246.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $232.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $240.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $218.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $214.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $-426.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $-5.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 10.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | $-24.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $-426.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $165.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-586.0K |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 57.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 20.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 7.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
