vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and KAMADA LTD (KMDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KAMADA LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.0M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.8× BayCom Corp). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs 11.3%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KAMADA LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.6% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, KAMADA LTD's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 2.9%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.
BCML vs KMDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $47.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | 37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $37.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $265.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $377.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.2M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $251.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $251.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $368.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $375.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $351.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $343.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | 1.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $-513.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
