vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BayCom Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.9× Venus Concept Inc.). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs -163.8%, a 190.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BayCom Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -8.2%). BayCom Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, BayCom Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -12.8%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
BCML vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCML
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
