vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BALCHEM CORP (BCPC) and Seneca Foods Corp (SENEB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Seneca Foods Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $270.7M, roughly 1.9× BALCHEM CORP). BALCHEM CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.9% vs 8.8%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BALCHEM CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 1.1%). BALCHEM CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.8M vs $22.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Seneca Foods Corp's revenue compounded faster (77.1% CAGR vs 7.5%).

Balchem Corp is a global specialty chemicals and nutritional ingredients provider that develops, manufactures and distributes application-specific products for human nutrition, animal health, pharmaceutical and industrial end markets, serving customers across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Seneca Foods Corporation is an American food processor and distributor headquartered in Fairport, New York, United States. Seneca Foods Corporation conducts its business almost entirely in food packaging, which contributed to about 98% of the company's fiscal year net sales in 2017. Canned vegetables represented 65%, fruit products represented 23%, frozen fruit and vegetables represented 11% and fruit chip products represented 1% of the total food packaging net sales. Non-food packaging sales...

BCPC vs SENEB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SENEB
SENEB
1.9× larger
SENEB
$508.3M
$270.7M
BCPC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BCPC
BCPC
+7.0% gap
BCPC
8.1%
1.1%
SENEB
Higher net margin
BCPC
BCPC
6.1% more per $
BCPC
14.9%
8.8%
SENEB
More free cash flow
BCPC
BCPC
$10.9M more FCF
BCPC
$33.8M
$22.9M
SENEB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SENEB
SENEB
Annualised
SENEB
77.1%
7.5%
BCPC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Revenue
$270.7M
$508.3M
Net Profit
$40.3M
$44.8M
Gross Margin
16.4%
Operating Margin
20.5%
11.8%
Net Margin
14.9%
8.8%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
1.1%
Net Profit YoY
8.7%
205.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.25
$6.48

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$270.7M
Q4 25
$263.6M
$508.3M
Q3 25
$267.6M
$460.0M
Q2 25
$255.5M
$297.5M
Q1 25
$250.5M
$345.8M
Q4 24
$240.0M
$502.9M
Q3 24
$239.9M
$425.5M
Q2 24
$234.1M
$304.7M
Net Profit
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$40.3M
Q4 25
$39.2M
$44.8M
Q3 25
$40.3M
$29.7M
Q2 25
$38.3M
$14.9M
Q1 25
$37.1M
$601.0K
Q4 24
$33.6M
$14.7M
Q3 24
$33.8M
$13.3M
Q2 24
$32.1M
$12.7M
Gross Margin
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
35.6%
16.4%
Q3 25
35.7%
13.4%
Q2 25
36.4%
14.1%
Q1 25
35.2%
4.5%
Q4 24
36.0%
9.8%
Q3 24
35.6%
10.1%
Q2 24
35.5%
14.0%
Operating Margin
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
20.5%
Q4 25
19.8%
11.8%
Q3 25
20.4%
9.0%
Q2 25
20.1%
7.8%
Q1 25
20.4%
0.6%
Q4 24
19.8%
5.1%
Q3 24
20.0%
5.8%
Q2 24
19.6%
8.3%
Net Margin
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
14.9%
Q4 25
14.9%
8.8%
Q3 25
15.1%
6.5%
Q2 25
15.0%
5.0%
Q1 25
14.8%
0.2%
Q4 24
14.0%
2.9%
Q3 24
14.1%
3.1%
Q2 24
13.7%
4.2%
EPS (diluted)
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$1.25
Q4 25
$1.21
$6.48
Q3 25
$1.24
$4.29
Q2 25
$1.17
$2.14
Q1 25
$1.13
$0.10
Q4 24
$1.03
$2.10
Q3 24
$1.03
$1.90
Q2 24
$0.98
$1.80

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$72.9M
$33.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$275.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$713.9M
Total Assets
$1.7B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.39×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$72.9M
Q4 25
$74.6M
$33.3M
Q3 25
$65.1M
$18.1M
Q2 25
$65.4M
$12.1M
Q1 25
$49.9M
$42.7M
Q4 24
$49.5M
$5.3M
Q3 24
$73.7M
$9.5M
Q2 24
$63.7M
$5.5M
Total Debt
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$275.8M
Q3 25
$280.2M
Q2 25
$293.9M
Q1 25
$369.9M
Q4 24
$416.2M
Q3 24
$504.6M
Q2 24
$572.1M
Stockholders' Equity
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$713.9M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$672.9M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$644.2M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$633.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$612.8M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$598.9M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$588.9M
Total Assets
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.7B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.39×
Q3 25
0.42×
Q2 25
0.46×
Q1 25
0.58×
Q4 24
0.68×
Q3 24
0.84×
Q2 24
0.97×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$40.1M
$31.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$33.8M
$22.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
12.5%
4.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.3%
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.99×
0.70×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$168.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$40.1M
Q4 25
$67.3M
$31.1M
Q3 25
$65.6M
$29.3M
Q2 25
$47.3M
$53.7M
Q1 25
$36.5M
$91.9M
Q4 24
$52.3M
$117.7M
Q3 24
$51.3M
$75.5M
Q2 24
$45.0M
$50.3M
Free Cash Flow
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
$33.8M
Q4 25
$22.9M
Q3 25
$21.8M
Q2 25
$42.4M
Q1 25
$81.4M
Q4 24
$108.7M
Q3 24
$70.0M
Q2 24
$38.3M
FCF Margin
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
12.5%
Q4 25
4.5%
Q3 25
4.7%
Q2 25
14.3%
Q1 25
23.5%
Q4 24
21.6%
Q3 24
16.4%
Q2 24
12.6%
Capex Intensity
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
2.3%
Q4 25
1.6%
Q3 25
1.6%
Q2 25
3.8%
Q1 25
3.0%
Q4 24
1.8%
Q3 24
1.3%
Q2 24
4.0%
Cash Conversion
BCPC
BCPC
SENEB
SENEB
Q1 26
0.99×
Q4 25
1.72×
0.70×
Q3 25
1.63×
0.99×
Q2 25
1.23×
3.61×
Q1 25
0.98×
152.87×
Q4 24
1.56×
8.03×
Q3 24
1.52×
5.68×
Q2 24
1.40×
3.98×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BCPC
BCPC

Segment breakdown not available.

SENEB
SENEB

Canned Vegetables$430.2M85%
Fruit$34.6M7%
Frozen$29.3M6%
Manufactured Product Other$10.8M2%
Snack$3.4M1%

Related Comparisons