vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BALCHEM CORP (BCPC) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $270.7M, roughly 1.9× BALCHEM CORP). BALCHEM CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.9% vs -9.3%, a 24.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $33.8M).
Balchem Corp is a global specialty chemicals and nutritional ingredients provider that develops, manufactures and distributes application-specific products for human nutrition, animal health, pharmaceutical and industrial end markets, serving customers across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific.
BCPC vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.7M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $40.3M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.9% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.25 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $270.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $263.6M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $267.6M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.5M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.5M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.2M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.3M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.3M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.1M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.6% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $72.9M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $72.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.1M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.9M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.1M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $33.8M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.5% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.3M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCPC
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |