vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC (BDL) and UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC (USLM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($87.9M vs $52.6M, roughly 1.7× FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC). UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC runs the higher net margin — 34.7% vs 1.5%, a 33.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 4.6%). UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.7M vs $4.5M). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Flanigans Enterprises Inc. is a U.S.-based hospitality company focused on the Florida market. It operates a chain of casual dining restaurants under the Flanigan's Seafood Bar and Grill brand, plus retail package liquor stores. Its key customer segments include local residents and regional tourists, offering affordably priced seafood, American comfort food and assorted beverages.
United States Lime & Minerals Inc is a leading US-based natural resources enterprise that produces high-calcium lime, dolomitic lime, limestone and related mineral products. Its core client segments cover infrastructure construction, steel manufacturing, agricultural soil amendment, environmental emission control and industrial processing, serving customers across North America.
BDL vs USLM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.6M | $87.9M |
| Net Profit | $805.0K | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 41.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 34.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.6% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1363.6% | 13.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | $87.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $91.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.4M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $80.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.4M | $89.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.1M | $71.7M |
| Q4 25 | $805.0K | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $896.0K | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.0K | $27.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0K | $33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 43.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 31.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.45 | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $-2.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $3.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $371.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.0M | $630.8M |
| Total Assets | $142.1M | $681.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $732.0K | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.0K | $300.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.9M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $66.0M | $630.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.2M | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.3M | $563.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.0M | $532.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.6M | $497.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.2M | $474.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.3M | $441.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.1M | $415.3M |
| Q4 25 | $142.1M | $681.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | $652.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | $607.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $585.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.9M | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.1M | $521.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.1M | $484.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.4M | $464.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.9M | $45.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.5M | $25.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 29.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.14× | 1.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.2M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.14× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.02× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.73× | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 140.02× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.75× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDL
| Restaurant Food Sales | $30.9M | 59% |
| Package Store Sales | $13.3M | 25% |
| Restaurant Bar Sales | $7.9M | 15% |
USLM
Segment breakdown not available.
