vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN) and HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp (HOFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.0M vs $70.7M, roughly 1.8× HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp). HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp runs the higher net margin — -29.9% vs -38.4%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -22.2%).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Hooker Furnishings Corp is a leading home furnishings manufacturer and marketer, offering residential seating, dining sets, bedroom furniture, home office pieces and custom upholstery. It serves retailers, designers and hospitality clients across North America, focusing on premium craftsmanship and diverse design styles.
BDN vs HOFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.0M | $70.7M |
| Net Profit | $-48.8M | $-21.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | -23.1% |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | -29.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.4% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-1.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.5M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.9M | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.8M | $95.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.3M | $93.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-48.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-36.7M | $-21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.7M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-165.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.4% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.1% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.3% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -5.5% |
| Q1 26 | -38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $-1.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $-0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.2M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.6B | $240.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $821.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $40.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.7M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $879.8M | $199.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.6M | $204.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $208.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $219.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $240.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $278.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $299.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $313.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $326.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $335.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
HOFT
| Upholstery | $36.7M | 52% |
| Domestic Upholstery | $30.2M | 43% |
| All Other | $4.0M | 6% |
