vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $127.0M, roughly 1.6× BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -38.4%, a 40.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
BDN vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.0M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-48.8M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.0M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.5M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.9M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.8M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.3M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-48.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-36.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.7M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.5M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-165.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.4% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.1% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.3% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | -38.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.5% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.28 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.2M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.6B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.2M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $879.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.5M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.