vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $127.0M, roughly 1.8× BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST). SILVERCORP METALS INC runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -38.4%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
BDN vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.0M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | $-48.8M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.9M | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.8M | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.3M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-48.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-36.7M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.7M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-165.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | -38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.5% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.4% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $3.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $879.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.7M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.1M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 2.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
