vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and Cytosorbents Corp (CTSO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytosorbents Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.0× Beam Global). Beam Global runs the higher net margin — -25.8% vs -59.5%, a 33.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 0.9%). Beam Global produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.8M vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Cytosorbents Corp's revenue compounded faster (1.3% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
CytoSorbents Corporation is a publicly traded company located in Princeton, New Jersey.
BEEM vs CTSO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $9.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 73.7% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | -47.5% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -59.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 27.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 73.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 70.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 70.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 71.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 73.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 76.5% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | -47.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | -30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | -37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | -44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -40.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -51.8% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | -59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | -33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | -16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -82.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -67.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $5.9M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $44.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $45.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $50.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $53.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $47.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $-4.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | -53.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-12.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-4.9M |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | -53.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | -27.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -54.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -54.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
CTSO
| Direct | $5.1M | 55% |
| Distributors And Strategic Partners | $4.2M | 45% |
