vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Beam Global is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $5.7M, roughly 1.6× QUICKLOGIC Corp). QUICKLOGIC Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -25.8%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -24.1%). QUICKLOGIC Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.2M vs $-3.8M). Over the past eight quarters, QUICKLOGIC Corp's revenue compounded faster (17.2% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
BEEM vs QUIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $5.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-305.0K |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | -24.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | -114.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-305.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $108.0K |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 54.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 67.1% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -49.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -37.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $24.9M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $51.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $49.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $116.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | -20.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-5.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $116.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-16.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-220.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $147.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-83.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $62.0K |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -102.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 96.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
