vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.6× Beam Global). SS Innovations International, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -17.0% vs -25.8%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 6.7%). SS Innovations International, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.2M vs $-3.8M). Over the past eight quarters, SS Innovations International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.9% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
BEEM vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -91.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -270.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $608.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $948.1K |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $35.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
