vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and TECHPRECISION CORP (TPCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Beam Global is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $7.1M, roughly 1.3× TECHPRECISION CORP). TECHPRECISION CORP runs the higher net margin — -20.8% vs -25.8%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -6.9%). TECHPRECISION CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-827.0K vs $-3.8M). Over the past eight quarters, TECHPRECISION CORP's revenue compounded faster (-9.2% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
TechPrecision Corp is a manufacturer of custom high-precision metal fabricated components and integrated systems, serving aerospace, defense, medical technology, renewable energy, and industrial end markets primarily across North America and Europe. It specializes in producing tight-tolerance, mission-critical parts that adhere to rigorous industry quality requirements.
BEEM vs TPCS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $7.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 5.4% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | -19.1% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -20.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | -84.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $825.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-597.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $112.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-799.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-601.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | -20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -59.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $50.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $8.0M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $32.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $220.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $195.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $165.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $32.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $34.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $183.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $-827.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | -11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-4.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $183.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $646.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $396.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $-570.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-532.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $107.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-452.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-827.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-604.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-94.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-900.0K |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
TPCS
| Defense | $6.7M | 94% |
| Other | $410.0K | 6% |
