vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and Xos, Inc. (XOS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Beam Global is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.7× Xos, Inc.). Beam Global runs the higher net margin — -25.8% vs -186.8%, a 161.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -54.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Beam Global's revenue compounded faster (-21.2% CAGR vs -35.7%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
Xos, Inc. is an American manufacturer of commercial electric vehicles (EVs) and mobile EV chargers.
BEEM vs XOS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | -50.5% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | -186.6% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -186.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | -54.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | -32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | -186.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | -42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | -38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -127.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -81.1% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | -186.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -40.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | -173.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -165.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -66.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -62.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -87.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-2.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-1.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $14.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $23.3M |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $60.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $46.2M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $59.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $67.8M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $80.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $87.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $98.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $120.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $123.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $135.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -168.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -115.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |
XOS
Segment breakdown not available.
