vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Celanese Corp (CE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KE Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.4× Celanese Corp). KE Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.2% vs 2.1%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, KE Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -6.1%).
KE Holdings Inc., operating under the well-known Beike brand, is a leading integrated online and offline residential service platform based in China. It offers a full range of services including second-hand property brokerage, new housing sales agency, home rental, renovation, and related financial consultation to meet diverse housing-related demands of consumers across multiple scenarios.
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
BEKE vs CE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | $48.0M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 340.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $155.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 24.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 9.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -80.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-17.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $1.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.5M |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $21.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $25.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $25.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $871.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $447.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $494.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $292.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $317.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $389.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $187.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEKE
| New home transaction services | $932.6M | 29% |
| Existing home transaction services | $841.5M | 26% |
| Home rental services | $804.4M | 25% |
| Home renovation and furnishing | $604.0M | 19% |
| Emerging and other services | $55.6M | 2% |
CE
Segment breakdown not available.
