vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Edison International (EIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edison International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $3.2B, roughly 1.6× KE Holdings Inc.). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 3.2%, a 32.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 9.8%).
KE Holdings Inc., operating under the well-known Beike brand, is a leading integrated online and offline residential service platform based in China. It offers a full range of services including second-hand property brokerage, new housing sales agency, home rental, renovation, and related financial consultation to meet diverse housing-related demands of consumers across multiple scenarios.
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
BEKE vs EIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | $1.8B |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 443.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $439.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.8M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 56.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $38.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $17.6B |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $94.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $364.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $465.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $992.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $15.2B |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $94.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $90.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $88.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $84.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $84.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5B | $83.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-319.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 36.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-715.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $882.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $329.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-830.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-184.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $961.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-236.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.64× | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | 4.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEKE
| New home transaction services | $932.6M | 29% |
| Existing home transaction services | $841.5M | 26% |
| Home rental services | $804.4M | 25% |
| Home renovation and furnishing | $604.0M | 19% |
| Emerging and other services | $55.6M | 2% |
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
