vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Franklin Resources (BEN) and Liberty Global Ltd. (LBTYA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Liberty Global Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.0× Franklin Resources). Franklin Resources runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs 15.0%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Franklin Resources posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Liberty Global Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 4.0%).
Franklin Resources, Inc. is an American multinational investment management holding company that, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to as Franklin Templeton; it is a global investment firm founded in New York City in 1947 as Franklin Distributors, Inc. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BEN, in honor of Benjamin Franklin, for whom the company is named, and who was admired by founder Rupert Johnson Sr. In 1973, the company's headquarters moved from Ne...
Liberty Global Ltd. is a British-Dutch-American multinational telecommunications company domiciled in Bermuda, with headquarters in London, Amsterdam and Denver. Its respective legal names are Liberty Global Holdings Limited (UK), Liberty Global B.V. (Netherlands) and Liberty Global, Inc., with the first of these being publicly traded. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UnitedGlobalCom (UGC).
BEN vs LBTYA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $346.6M | $358.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.1% | 127.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.49 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $346.6M | $358.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.5M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.6M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.3M | $-2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.4M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-84.7M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | $268.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 66.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 65.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 68.5% |
| Q1 26 | 14.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -237.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -220.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -114.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | -158.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.8% | -74.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $-8.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $-8.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $6.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-3.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $-387.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $669.7B | — |
| Total Assets | — | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-387.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $14.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $14.7B |
| Q1 26 | $669.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $13.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9B | $18.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.5B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4B | $25.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6B | $27.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0B | $26.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4B | $25.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.5B | $41.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3B | $40.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | 0.80× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-255.1M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.7M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.1M | $129.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-145.2M | $791.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.2M | $449.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $528.4M | $546.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-51.9M | $-41.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $-170.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.6M | $-114.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-217.0M | $712.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.4M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $482.3M | $256.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.4% | -13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.6% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.7% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.89× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.04× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEN
Segment breakdown not available.
LBTYA
| Mobile Service | $775.2M | 32% |
| Fixed Service | $772.0M | 32% |
| Business | $308.7M | 13% |
| Wholesale | $256.9M | 11% |
| Business Service | $233.2M | 10% |
