vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and CIVITAS RESOURCES, INC. (CIVI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× CIVITAS RESOURCES, INC.). On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -8.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Civitas Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based sustainable energy enterprise focused on the exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It primarily operates across the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado, prioritizing low-emission, responsible energy production to meet diverse North American energy demand.
BEP vs CIVI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $1.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 33.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $2.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.74 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $56.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $6.7B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $15.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $91.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.8B |
| Q3 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $14.1B |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $860.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $860.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $298.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $719.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $858.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $835.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $359.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $813.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $843.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
CIVI
| Crude Oil Natural Gas And Natural Gas Liquids | $1.2B | 99% |
| Oil And Gas Operation And Maintenance | $8.0M | 1% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.0M | 0% |
