vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Dover Corporation (DOV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dover Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.2× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Dover Corporation runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 5.9%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 12.5%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
BEP vs DOV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $282.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $2.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $282.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $282.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $279.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $230.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $347.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 96.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 12.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $2.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $2.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $7.4B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.45× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $11.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $543.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $439.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $353.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $203.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $370.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $325.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
