vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Evercore Inc. (EVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× Evercore Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 5.9%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 14.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
BEP vs EVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $322.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 23.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 100.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 106.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $7.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $699.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $979.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $738.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $693.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $322.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $204.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $144.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $140.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $1.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $3.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $807.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $560.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $686.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $234.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $348.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $798.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $541.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $411.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-569.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $673.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $340.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 4.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
