vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs -18.5%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -72.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. is an American discount closeout retailer consisting exclusively of supermarket locations that offer discounted, overstocked, and closeout products from name-brand and private-label suppliers. The company has stores in California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and Delaware.
BEP vs GO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $-224.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -72.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | -669.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $-2.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-224.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $69.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $15.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $983.7M |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $69.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $66.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $500.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $473.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $475.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $477.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $429.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $379.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $291.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $983.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.24× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $222.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $222.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $41.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 14.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
