vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and KeyCorp (KEY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KeyCorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.2× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). KeyCorp runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs 5.9%, a 19.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KeyCorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (131.8% vs 14.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Key is a Japanese visual novel studio known for making dramatic and plot-oriented titles. It was formed on July 21, 1998, as a brand under the publisher Visual Arts, and is located in Kita, Osaka.
BEP vs KEY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $510.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 32.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 25.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 131.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 309.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $865.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $695.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $489.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-244.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-410.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $274.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $219.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -92.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -59.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $10.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $20.4B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $184.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $11.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $14.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $184.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $185.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $187.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $189.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $187.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $187.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 104.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 4.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-140.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $664.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $-217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $359.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-150.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-230.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $347.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -175.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
