vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 0.0%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 1.4%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Swift Transportation is an American truckload motor shipping carrier based in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2017, Swift merged with Knight Transportation, also of Phoenix, forming Knight-Swift.
BEP vs KNX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $96.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | -76.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $96.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $20.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $222.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $7.1B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $222.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $220.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $192.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $216.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $209.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $186.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $12.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $142.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $56.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 1484.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $723.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $217.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $216.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $274.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $273.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $56.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1484.79× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 6.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
KNX
| Revenue, excluding truckload and LTL fuel surcharge | $1.6B | 89% |
| Truckload and LTL fuel surcharge | $212.2M | 11% |
