vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Lineage, Inc. (LINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× Lineage, Inc.). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs -7.3%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 3.1%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
BEP vs LINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $-100.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $-0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-40.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $151.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | 12.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $19.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $173.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.5B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $19.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $19.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $18.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $65.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $230.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $35.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $139.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $186.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $155.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $382.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 2.53× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
LINE
| Warehousing Operations | $883.0M | 64% |
| Other | $308.0M | 22% |
| Warehouse Lease | $60.0M | 4% |
| Food Sales | $52.0M | 4% |
| E Commerce And Other | $46.0M | 3% |
| Railcar Lease | $23.0M | 2% |
| Service Other | $5.0M | 0% |
