vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Microchip Technology (MCHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Microchip Technology). Microchip Technology runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs 5.9%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -72.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Microchip Technology Incorporated is an American publicly traded semiconductor corporation that manufactures microcontroller, mixed-signal, analog, and Flash-IP integrated circuits.
BEP vs MCHP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $144.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -72.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 8.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $970.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $144.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $129.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $240.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $6.4B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $14.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $250.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $566.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $771.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $286.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $315.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $15.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $242.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $871.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $341.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $88.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $271.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $377.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $242.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $318.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $257.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $191.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $304.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.