vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.4× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 4.5%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 9.6%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) is an American cruise line founded in Norway in 1966, headquartered in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and incorporated in the Bahamas. It is the fourth-largest cruise line in the world by passengers, controlling about 8.6% of the total worldwide share of the cruise market by passengers as of 2021. It is wholly owned by parent company Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings.
BEP vs NCLH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $104.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $104.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $419.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $254.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $163.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $185.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $15.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $23.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 6.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $185.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $166.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $184.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $332.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $594.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $693.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $21.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $20.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.23× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $811.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 16.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 7.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $811.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $459.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $714.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $399.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $172.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $670.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-726.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $381.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-846.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-195.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $330.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.75× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 23.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
NCLH
| Passenger ticket | $1.5B | 66% |
| Onboard and other | $788.9M | 34% |