vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Old Dominion (ODFL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Old Dominion). Old Dominion runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs 5.9%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -5.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is an American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload shipping (LTL) company. In addition to its core LTL services, the company offers expedited, logistics and household moving services.
BEP vs ODFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $229.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 23.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 17.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -5.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | -12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $1.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $270.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $254.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $308.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $322.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $292.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $120.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $20.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $5.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $104.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $581.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $60.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $310.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $264.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 1.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $955.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $437.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $401.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $387.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $423.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $343.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $248.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $304.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
ODFL
| LTL Service Revenue | $1.3B | 99% |
| Other Service Revenue | $11.4M | 1% |
