vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.3× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 5.9%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -36.8%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
BEP vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
