vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 5.9%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 2.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
BEP vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
