vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Trade Desk (The) (TTD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $846.8M, roughly 2.0× Trade Desk (The)). Trade Desk (The) runs the higher net margin — 22.1% vs 5.9%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trade Desk (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 14.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
The Trade Desk, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in real-time programmatic marketing automation technologies, products, and services, designed to personalize digital content delivery to users.
BEP vs TTD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $846.8M |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $186.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 22.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 2.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $846.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $739.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $694.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $616.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $741.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $584.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $491.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $182.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $94.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 78.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $311.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 33.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $795.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $311.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $224.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $291.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $273.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $185.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $158.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $232.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $179.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $224.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $178.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
TTD
| Other | $427.2M | 50% |
| Non Us | $419.6M | 50% |
