vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and UGI CORP (UGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UGI CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.2× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). UGI CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs 5.9%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 3.9%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
UGI Corporation is a natural gas and electric power distribution company headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, with extensive operations in the United States and Europe.
BEP vs UGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $297.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 14.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | -20.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $1.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $-163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $479.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $375.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-273.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $496.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $251.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $426.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $240.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.40× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $66.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-155.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 0.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $282.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $289.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $684.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $390.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $522.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-168.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $538.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $353.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
