vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and CIMPRESS plc (CMPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIMPRESS plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $952.0M, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Renewable Corp). CIMPRESS plc runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -152.0%, a 156.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIMPRESS plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Cimpress plc is an American Irish-domiciled multinational technology company that invests in and operates a wide variety of businesses that use mass customization to configure and produce small quantities of individually customized goods. Those products are sold to small businesses, graphic designers and consumers through a number of customer-facing brands that Cimpress operates.
BEPC vs CMPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $49.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -19.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $863.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $901.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $997.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 114.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $258.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $-530.7M |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $595.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $790.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-530.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-571.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $13.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $44.2B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $41.8B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $164.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $139.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $253.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $323.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
CMPR
| Vista | $532.8M | 51% |
| Print Brothers | $219.9M | 21% |
| National Pen | $150.9M | 14% |
| The Print Group | $115.2M | 11% |
| All Other Businesses | $67.2M | 6% |
