vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Corpay (CPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Corpay is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $952.0M, roughly 1.3× Brookfield Renewable Corp). Corpay runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs -152.0%, a 173.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Corpay posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.7% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Corpay, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, provides payments and spend management systems and services that control expense-related purchasing and payment processes. The company focuses on vehicle-related expenses, lodging expenses, and corporate payments.
BEPC vs CPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $264.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 45.2% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 7.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.74 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $975.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $935.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $243.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $246.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $276.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $251.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $229.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $26.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $20.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $16.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $812.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $760.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 60.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $812.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-378.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $400.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $540.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $350.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $760.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-429.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-118.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $604.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $355.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $496.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $309.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 98.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
CPAY
| Vehicle Payments | $572.9M | 46% |
| Corporate Payments | $480.8M | 39% |
| Lodging Payments | $112.5M | 9% |
| Other Operating Segments | $82.1M | 7% |
