vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and ESAB Corp (ESAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $727.8M, roughly 1.3× ESAB Corp). ESAB Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -152.0%, a 159.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESAB Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
BEPC vs ESAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $727.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $54.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.6% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 2.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $727.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $715.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $678.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $670.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $673.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $689.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $689.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $67.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $82.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $218.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $249.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $228.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $992.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $81.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $70.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $35.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $126.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $122.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $103.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
ESAB
| Consumable Products | $477.9M | 66% |
| Equipment Products | $249.9M | 34% |
