vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Fortive (FTV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $952.0M, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Renewable Corp). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs -152.0%, a 164.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
BEPC vs FTV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $136.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 7.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 21.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $136.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $185.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $166.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $221.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $195.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $356.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $6.1B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $356.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $430.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $892.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $811.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $644.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $234.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $193.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $935.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $234.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $311.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $502.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $459.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $308.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $193.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $313.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $215.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $465.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $431.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.