vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $477.2M, roughly 2.0× Acushnet Holdings Corp.). Acushnet Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — -7.3% vs -152.0%, a 144.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Acushnet Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
The Acushnet Company is an American company focused on the golf market. The company operates a series of brands that manufacture golf equipment, clothing and accessories.
BEPC vs GOLF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $477.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $-34.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -3027.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $477.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $657.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $720.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $703.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $445.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $620.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $683.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $707.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $71.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $926.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $783.6M |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $926.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $753.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $783.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $852.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $808.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $780.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $765.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $863.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $883.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $-338.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $120.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-338.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $163.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $151.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-120.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $211.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-109.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-131.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $123.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $196.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-116.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
GOLF
| Titleist Golf Equipment | $293.8M | 62% |
| Footjoy Golf Wear | $102.0M | 21% |
| Other | $45.3M | 9% |
| Golf Gear | $36.1M | 8% |
