vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Invitation Homes (INVH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $685.3M, roughly 1.4× Invitation Homes). Invitation Homes runs the higher net margin — 21.1% vs -152.0%, a 173.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Invitation Homes posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Invitation Homes Inc. is a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange. It is headquartered in the Lincoln Center building in Dallas, Texas. Dallas B. Tanner is chief executive officer. As of 2017, the company was reportedly the largest owner of single-family rental homes in the United States. As of July 2024, the company owned about 84,000 rental homes in 16 markets. Seventeen percent of their rental income is from California.
BEPC vs INVH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $685.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $144.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 21.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $685.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $688.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $681.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $659.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $653.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $646.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $165.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $143.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $142.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $130.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $9.5B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $749.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $738.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $128.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $122.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 17.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $394.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $382.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $300.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $313.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $369.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $387.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $374.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $293.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $363.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $257.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
