vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $952.0M, roughly 2.0× Brookfield Renewable Corp). NEWELL BRANDS INC. runs the higher net margin — -16.6% vs -152.0%, a 135.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEWELL BRANDS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.7% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
BEPC vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $372.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-27.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
