vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Old Dominion (ODFL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Old Dominion is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $952.0M, roughly 1.4× Brookfield Renewable Corp). Old Dominion runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -152.0%, a 169.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Old Dominion posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is an American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload shipping (LTL) company. In addition to its core LTL services, the company offers expedited, logistics and household moving services.
BEPC vs ODFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 23.8% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -6.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $270.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $254.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $308.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $322.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 21.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $288.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $288.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $104.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $437.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $401.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $387.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $343.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $248.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
