vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $828.2M, roughly 1.1× Rithm Capital Corp.). Rithm Capital Corp. runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs -152.0%, a 165.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Capital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (508.5% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
BEPC vs RITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $828.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $109.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.9% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 508.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 27.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $828.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $768.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $619.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $311.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $235.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 25.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 19.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $53.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $35.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $42.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $-557.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $768.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $-55.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
RITM
| Servicing revenue, net | $375.1M | 45% |
| Other | $234.9M | 28% |
| Gain on originated residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | $195.0M | 24% |
| Other revenue | $23.3M | 3% |
