vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BETA Technologies, Inc. (BETA) and Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marti Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $8.9M, roughly 1.6× BETA Technologies, Inc.). On growth, BETA Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (190.9% vs 63.1%).
Unity Software Inc. is an American video game software development company based in San Francisco. It was founded in Denmark in 2004 as Over the Edge Entertainment and changed its name in 2007. Unity Technologies is best known for the development of Unity, a licensed game engine used to create video games and other applications.
The Marti Group is a Swiss construction company, consisting of over 80 subsidiaries, officially owned by Marti Holding AG. Besides Switzerland, they are active in neighboring countries such as Germany and Austria, and also outside of Europe such as China and Chile. The company is known for high-profile public and private sector projects and using innovative technologies. Their areas of expertise include building construction, construction and renovation of tunnels, road construction, hydrauli...
BETA vs MRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.9M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-437.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | -903.5% | -86.1% |
| Net Margin | -4902.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 190.9% | 63.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -482.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-9.83 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M |
| Q3 25 | $-437.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -903.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -86.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2381.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -204.1% |
| Q3 25 | -4902.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2448.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-9.83 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.81 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $687.6M | $4.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $789.9M | $-73.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $17.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $687.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.2M |
| Q3 25 | $789.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-51.2M |
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-183.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-209.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2344.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 287.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-183.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-209.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -2344.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 287.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BETA
| Commerical Customers | $6.2M | 70% |
| United States Government | $2.7M | 30% |
MRT
Segment breakdown not available.
