vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Better Home & Finance Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.3M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.6× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Hyperscale Data, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -112.0% vs -3349.0%, a 3237.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 38.4%). Hyperscale Data, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-56.2M vs $-167.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Better Home & Finance Holding Co's revenue compounded faster (41.1% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
BETR vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BETR
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |