vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and CS Disco, Inc. (LAW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Better Home & Finance Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.3M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.1× CS Disco, Inc.). CS Disco, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.0% vs -3349.0%, a 3326.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Better Home & Finance Holding Co's revenue compounded faster (41.1% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
BETR vs LAW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-9.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -23.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | 15.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $36.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | -35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | -70.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | -34.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -23.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | -33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | -28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | -31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -30.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $103.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $123.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $162.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $113.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | $114.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $118.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $130.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | $137.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | $167.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $170.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $162.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $173.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $174.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $164.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $180.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $198.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $-11.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $762.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $-650.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $255.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | $-1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | -30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
