vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $44.3M, roughly 1.3× Better Home & Finance Holding Co). Nano Dimension Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -171.1% vs -3349.0%, a 3177.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Nano Dimension Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-21.1M vs $-167.8M).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
BETR vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
