vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $44.3M, roughly 1.7× Better Home & Finance Holding Co). On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 27.7%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-167.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Better Home & Finance Holding Co's revenue compounded faster (41.1% CAGR vs 31.3%).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
BETR vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
