vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Quipt Home Medical Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.0M vs $44.3M, roughly 1.1× Better Home & Finance Holding Co). Quipt Home Medical Corp. runs the higher net margin — -2.1% vs -3349.0%, a 3346.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 32.3%). Quipt Home Medical Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.9M vs $-167.8M).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Quipt Home Medical Corp is a U.S.-based home medical equipment provider specializing in respiratory care, sleep therapy supplies, and chronic disease management products. It serves patients with long-term health conditions, partners with healthcare providers and insurance payers across operating regions to deliver accessible in-home medical solutions.
BETR vs QIPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $49.0M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | 32.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | 2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $49.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $33.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $10.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $113.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $280.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $10.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $113.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $112.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | $102.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $106.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $280.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $283.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $236.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $244.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $242.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $6.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | 14.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | $26.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
