vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Better Home & Finance Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.3M vs $27.1M, roughly 1.6× Rumble Inc.). Rumble Inc. runs the higher net margin — -120.8% vs -3349.0%, a 3228.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs -10.5%). Rumble Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.7M vs $-167.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Better Home & Finance Holding Co's revenue compounded faster (41.1% CAGR vs 15.2%).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
BETR vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | $263.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BETR
Segment breakdown not available.
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |